1.  Five days into Winter and record snow fall has blanketed much of the United States much to the disappointment of liberals like Al Gore who has made 100’s of millions of dollars scaring the world with his nonsense of melting ice caps.

2.  Charlie Sheen appears to have relapsed as Aspen police were called out at 8:34 Christmas Day.  Sheen was arrested for felony domestic battery after being up all night boozing. Sheen, who has been an outspoken critic of war and supporter of diplomacy,  should take some of his own advice.

3.  Apple stock hit an all-time high on Thursday as rumors are circulating that the innovative company will be announcing “iPad”– a tablet computer that is said to operate on the iPhone software and is said to be a computer, digital book reader, and portable video device all wrapped up in one.  Of interesting note, Apple is also rumored to have purchased the domain name, iSlate.com.  Looks like the Kindel will become so yesterday after the iPad is launched if the rumors prove to be true.

4.  Retailers are expecting a strong December 26th since the day after Christmas falls on a Saturday.  Best Buy and Walmart are extending their holiday discounts in an effort to lure more shopper into their stores.  Take it from me, the best deals can be found after the third week of January.

5.  Terror in the skies over the United States struck again on Christmas as a radical Muslim attempted to kill hundreds of Christians on their most holy of days.  Saved by a miracle, the plane was able to land safely and the terrorist oppressed gentleman was taken into custody where he will surely be provided his Miranda rights,  an attorney paid for by US taxpayers,  his Koran, hot cooked meals appropriate for his faith, a warm bed, and a comfortable living environment.

Things are getting really confusing to me and I’m needing a liberal to take the time to really explain to me a couple of question that I have.  First, I don’t want you liberals to go on a tirade and repeat those excuses that you’ve been brainwashed to repeat.  For example; its George Bushes fault or global warming is responsible for global cooling.  I want some honest research and intelligent answers.

First dilemma;

I need help in understanding why Al Gore repeats so-called facts that he knows is inaccurate or outright lies.  Why he hasn’t corrected the many false claims he continues to make and that have been found to be false in his book, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’?  Do liberals not have an issue with, what I consider a conflict of interest, Al Gore pushing so-called, “Green Energy” and these carbon exchanging when his venture capital partnership is poised to make billions of dollars if the government enacts some of Al Gore’s proposals?   Or, is it acceptable to liberals for Al Gore and his liberal cronies to make billions off of an unproven science at the expense of the taxpayers while berating Cheney who, as a CEO of a service company, made a few million heading a company that provided a service and thousands of jobs?

Which brings me to my next question; do liberals feel that they’ve been lied to over this global warming climate change hysteria?  By the way, have you noticed that, since the Earth has been getting colder, liberals now call it “climate change”.  It’s difficult to sell “global warming” when your freezing your a*s off, but then again, there are some really stupid people who, if told that freezing cold is the result of global warming, will believe it. Every day there are more scientist who are speaking up and saying that man has no control or impact on the climate.  Are liberals aware that man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history?  Can a liberals admit that they’ve been scammed or will they bring the whole country down with them to protect and defend an ideology, because they’re too proud to admit they’ve been wrong?

Now this is something that REALLY has boggled my mind; what was wrong with the prison at Guantánamo Bay?  What’s the difference if they’re housed at Gitmo or in Chicago, aside from the fact that this administration has just put a huge target on the city and has put the prison guards and their family’s at risk.  I mean, how easy is it for an Al Qaeda operative to follow a prison guard home and threatening to kill his wife and children.  Just a thought.  It seems liberals saw Guantanamo as a way of criticizing Bush and liberal politician were quick to jump on the bandwagon rather than educating their supporters on why Gitmo was and is important.  Liberals like Obama, have boxed themselves in a corner and it’s for that reason that he’s now forced to close Gitmo and do nothing more than move them to a prison with a different name, albeit on US soil.

I have many other question, but I don’t want to get these liberals too exhausted having to actually research facts rather than emulating Al Gore and repeating the some tired lies and lines that are fed to them.

_________________

Have the Obama Administration and these liberals lost their minds?  I mean honestly, have they?  I get an AP alert on my iPhone that the EPA has now declared Carbon Dioxide a pollutant.  Are you kidding me?  Are you truly and honestly kidding me!!!  First, let me be clear, this is nothing more than another way for government to invent an excuse to penalize companies so that they can extract more money from them.

Here are the facts;  without carbon dioxide there would be NO VEGETATION!!!  And without vegetation there would be no oxygen.  You see, Trees convert carbon dioxide into carbohydrates during photosynthesis, releasing oxygen in the process.  It’s high school biology.  Here’s another fact; humans breath in oxygen and in the respiration process, we breath out, gasp, carbon dioxide.   Is the Obama administration now going to regulate and tax our lungs?

People, when are some of you going to wake the heck up and see what’s going on.  This whole nonsense of global warming has been nothing more than one giant hoax by the left designed to tax you more.  Is there any sane person out there who honestly believes that 40 years of data can determine whether or not the Earth is truly getting warmer when the Earth has been around for billions of years?  Has anyone notice that now that we’ve been experiencing global cooling, the radicals have now gone from “global warming” to using “climate change”.  Hello!!! Of course there’s going to be a change in the climate– there are many variables for this and the main one is the Sun.

Do not let these liberals, who have made billions, (Al Gore stand up), scaring you into believing that man has anything to do with changing the climate.  It is complete nonsense.  One volcano eruption emits more “pollutants” into the air than the United States has managed to emit throughout the last 100 years.   Just yesterday night, I read a report that’s being presented in Copenhagen that cows release more CO2 than all cars driven by man.  Does this mean we kill the cows?  Man would be arrogant to believe that we can control the climate of this planet.  God designed a unique world for us that works in perfect harmony with nature.  The Earth is a marvelous creation.

Wall Street Journal:

An “endangerment” finding by the Environmental Protection Agency could pave the way for the government to require businesses that emit carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases to make costly changes in machinery to reduce emissions — even if Congress doesn’t pass pending climate-change legislation. EPA action to regulate emissions could affect the U.S. economy more directly, and more quickly, than any global deal inked in the Danish capital, where no binding agreement is expected…

The vast majority of increased greenhouse-gas emissions is expected to come from developing countries such as China and India, not from rich countries like the U.S. But developing countries have made it clear that their willingness to reduce growth in emissions will depend on what rich countries do first. That puts a geopolitical spotlight on the U.S.

At the heart of the fight over whether U.S. emission constraints should come from the EPA or Congress is a high-stakes issue: which industries will have to foot the bill for a climate cleanup. A similar theme will play out in Copenhagen as rich countries wrangle over how much they should have to pay to help the developing world shift to cleaner technologies.

“There is no agreement without money,” says Rosário Bento Pais, a top climate negotiator for the European Commission, the European Union’s executive arm. “That is clear.” Full Story

___________________